It’s astonishing how flawed recruitment processes are overall. As a recent graduate eager to enter the field of recruitment, I’m genuinely taken aback by what I’ve observed in the industry. Given my background in a rigorous scientific program, I expected some gap between research and practice in personnel selection, but the reality is far more significant than I anticipated.

For instance, recruiters are often hired based on their sales experience, which makes little sense. Candidates are frequently judged as the “next big thing” simply because they have an eye-catching CV or a well-crafted cover letter. Meanwhile, hiring managers shy away from assessments due to concerns about candidates faking results, yet they are easily swayed by visually appealing resumes, overlooking the actual content.

Where is the emphasis on utilizing valid and reliable performance predictors? Those that have undergone rigorous scientific testing? It’s baffling that people believe they can gauge personality, motivation, and other traits based solely on two documents — documents that applicants sometimes pay “experts” to create.

The entire process feels fundamentally misguided.