Background Checks: To Charge or Not to Charge?

I’m interested in how others approach the costs of background checks. As the owner of a boutique recruiting firm, we currently offer background checks as an optional service, charging clients at-cost. In recent years, nearly every client except one has opted for this service. Since it’s optional, I don’t incorporate these costs into my standard fees, treating it as an a la carte offering.

Here are my questions:

  1. Does my at-cost pricing model come across as convenient and transparent? That’s the intent behind it.
  2. Or does it seem a bit off? I base my hiring fees on known operating costs, which don’t include these optional background checks. I understand that clients might not see the distinction. Should I absorb these costs or adjust my fees? I’d appreciate a gut check on this.
  3. Is this model overly complicated? Another option could be to set a flat fee, like $200, which would usually exceed my costs. On the rare occasions where the cost goes above $200, I would anticipate that the previous excess would even things out. Pros: simpler for clients and easier for invoicing. Cons: I might occasionally incur losses totaling a few hundred dollars.

For context:

  • Direct hire fees are typically 20-22%, with totals between $16k and $40k.
  • Monthly contractor fees are about +/- 30%.
  • The minimum cost for a background check is around $160, with the average ranging from $180-$200. Some cases can exceed $500, depending on the number of verifications required.
  • I haven’t received any complaints from clients; I’m just reassessing ways to improve our processes.
  • I aim to provide a white-glove service to small businesses and startups, positioning ourselves as a hassle-free solution (“We’ve got this, you don’t have to think about it”).