Subject: Feedback Needed on ATS Options: Ashby, RecruitCRM, and Recruiterflow
Hello, everyone!
We are in the process of transitioning our Applicant Tracking System (ATS) this year. Currently, we are using Lever, but we’ve decided to make a change due to their limitations on multiple aliases and email domains. This is particularly important for us as we operate two distinct recruiting businesses – one focused on internal hiring and the other on virtual recruitment staffing. We need the flexibility to communicate with candidates using different email addresses.
At this stage, we’ve narrowed our options down to three systems: Ashby, RecruitCRM, and Recruiterflow.
Before making our final decision, I would love to hear your thoughts and experiences with these ATS platforms.
Additionally, for those using Ashby – I understand it is mainly geared towards in-house recruitment. Are there any agency users here? If so, what strategies or workarounds have you implemented?
I appreciate your input, everyone! Thank you!
RCadmin
Hi there!
I can definitely understand your need for a versatile ATS that supports multiple aliases and email domains, especially when managing different recruiting businesses. Here’s a bit of feedback on each of the systems you mentioned:
Ashby: While it’s true that Ashby is often geared toward in-house recruitment, I’ve seen some agencies successfully adapt it for their needs. The platform’s strengths lie in its user-friendly interface and robust analytics features. Agencies have used workarounds like creating separate pipelines or utilizing custom fields to differentiate between the two recruitment streams. It might require some adjustments, but it can definitely work if you’re willing to put in the effort to customize it.
RecruitCRM: This is a solid choice for agencies, as it’s designed with recruiters in mind. It has excellent features for managing candidate relations, and the ability to handle multiple email domains is a big plus for your situation. The interface is intuitive, and the support team is generally quite responsive.
Recruiterflow: I’ve heard good things about Recruiterflow, particularly for its automation features and seamless integration with various tools. It also allows multiple aliases, which fits your needs perfectly. Recruiterflow has a good reputation for being agency-friendly, so you might find it easier to manage your two separate businesses.
It could be useful to schedule demos with each of these platforms to see which one feels right for your specific hiring processes.
I hope this helps! Let us know if you have any other questions. Good luck with your decision!