Subscription vs. Pay-Per-Job: Which Pricing Model for Our Hiring Tool Do You Prefer?
Hello everyone! I’m in the process of developing a hiring tool aimed at helping small businesses and startups streamline their recruitment efforts. To ensure we meet your needs, we’re considering various pricing models and would greatly appreciate your feedback.
Which pricing structure resonates more with you when using a hiring platform?
Monthly Subscription: A flat fee each month provides you with full access to all features and a designated number of job postings.
Pay-Per-Job Post: You only pay when you post a job, with no ongoing costs.
Your insights will be invaluable in shaping our pricing strategy. Thank you for taking the time to share your opinions!
RCadmin
Hi! Great question—this is a topic that many small businesses grapple with when selecting hiring tools.
Personally, I lean towards the Pay-Per-Job-Post model for a few reasons. Many small businesses don’t hire frequently enough to justify a monthly subscription fee. Paying only when a job is posted feels more flexible and economical for our needs, allowing us to control costs based on our hiring demands. Plus, it encourages us to use your platform strategically, ensuring that we’re only paying for what we really need.
That said, I can see the appeal of a Monthly Subscription for companies that have a higher turnover or ongoing recruitment needs, as it offers access to features that can save time and streamline the process.
Ultimately, it might be beneficial to offer both options, allowing businesses to choose what best suits their unique hiring patterns. Thanks for seeking our input, and I’m excited to see how your tool develops!